Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
About Deviant Lucy WellingtonFemale/Russia Groups :iconraiden-fan: RAIDEN-FAN
Thunder take you!
Recent Activity
Deviant for 7 Years
Needs Core Membership
Statistics 1,157 Deviations 14,886 Comments 61,323 Pageviews
×

Newest Deviations

Favourites

Groups

Requests, Art Trades etc. are temporarily closed.


First of all, I've encountered two definitions of it.
  1. For any given male character, there is a female version of that character.
  2. For any given character, there is an opposite gender version of that character.

In this article I'll stick with the first one.

For both cases, there are 2 exceptions:
  • The character is androgynous. (What about agender ones? )
  • Genderbending hasn't been applied... yet.

Now for the problems. (The list is unordered on purpose.)

  •  "Just put a bow on it"
Female versions receive stereotypically "feminine" stuff as distinctive features. Starting from appearance, ending with character traits.
How else are we supposed to tell they are female? :sarcasm:
That goes well with "male by default" stereotype.
  • Female means derivative
At first glance, opposes the previous one. But, trust me, they can coexist.
Female version is not much different from male one. But it still feels repetitive and derivative.
Problem is, the female version has no individuality. (As for the previous one, so-called individuality is nothing but gender stereotypes.)
  • Obligatory fanservice
Female version is "hawt", clothes are more revealing, the body type includes big T&A. Not even ugly female characters can be ugly.
  • Pairing Sues
The name says it all. Rule 63 and Pairing Sue-ing go well together.
Pairing Sue has "a lot in common" with her love interest, she is "perfect for him" and is nothing on her own.

Conclusion.
I don't mind female counterparts (especially if it involves "bringing more taco to a sausage party"). But Rule 63 is such a disservice to female characters in general.

deviantID

Simony17y
Lucy Wellington
Russia

Page dolls made by :iconel-raijin:

AdCast - Ads from the Community

×

Comments


Add a Comment:
 
:iconarrow-4-u:
ArRoW-4-U Featured By Owner Apr 28, 2016  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Ah I see you're back to my watchers, thanks and WB anyways :D
Reply
:iconsimony17y:
Simony17y Featured By Owner Apr 28, 2016
:D
Reply
:iconkishiyamato:
KishiYamato Featured By Owner Mar 3, 2016  Student Artist
Thank you for visiting :D
Reply
:iconsimony17y:
Simony17y Featured By Owner Mar 3, 2016
You're welcome. :D
Reply
:iconedenianknight:
EdenianKnight Featured By Owner Mar 2, 2016  Hobbyist Artist
Спасибо за фав)
Reply
:iconsimony17y:
Simony17y Featured By Owner Mar 3, 2016
:D
Reply
:iconjohnwalker1999:
johnwalker1999 Featured By Owner Feb 21, 2016
Guess who 
Reply
:iconsimony17y:
Simony17y Featured By Owner Feb 21, 2016
Huh? :confused:
Reply
:iconjohnwalker1999:
johnwalker1999 Featured By Owner Feb 22, 2016
Jwpiszczek 
Reply
:iconsimony17y:
Simony17y Featured By Owner Feb 23, 2016
Oh. :)
Reply
(1 Reply)
Add a Comment: